6-6-6

this is not a satanic post! this has to do with something i heard on the radio this morning. i had never heard of this before, but i find it an interesting concept. according to a woman's magazine (don't know which one for sure because the d.j. on the radio said she first heard about it like 8 years ago) women use a 6-6-6 scale when choosing a mate. it is believed that the man must be at least 6 feet tall, make at least 6 figures, and be packing at least 6 inches below the belt. they posed the question on the radio, which one is most important to you? so of course, i got to thinking...

height isn't really an issue to me. i've dated tall guys and short guys. i've dated guys around my height (i'm 5'5"). taller guys are nice, but i wouldn't say i need my man to be at least 6 feet tall.

money is kinda an issue to me. esp. since i never have any. my ideal guy needs to be able to make money and be financially stable. but i don't require 6 figures. as long as he can hold a job, make money, and pay the bills that is all i care about.

so that leaves "the package." hmmm... some say size doesn't matter. some say that it's that the guy knows how to use what he has. well i call bullshit! size DOES matter! i've been with a guy who was very small--not a fun experience. i've been with a guy that was too big--also not all that fun (although more fun than the small guy). i'm not sure if i need 6 inches (i've never actually measured a penis before and i'm not good at estimating length), but i need a good fit.

so out of the 6-6-6 rule, i go with the package. is that crazy? i rank sexual satisfaction as a high priority and i don't think a guy can work with something he doesn't have.

what i'm really wondering now is what is most important to you? if you had to choose one of these criteria, which would you go for? please share with us!